Reference services and Twitter
A few weeks ago, a friend put the idea into my head about whether there might be a use for Twitter for reference. If you're not familiar with Twitter, here's the basics:
- sign up for a free account
- send mini blog posts (140 characters max) to your account via a web form, your IM client (AIM, Gtalk, Jabber) , or your cell phone (as a text message)
- receive mini blog posts sent by those who you've selected from the Twitter network as friends; read the posts on your Twitter page or as text messages on your cell phone
- Casa Grande Public Library (AZ)
- As Jeff Scott noted on his blog on the Library 2.0 network, took the feeds of library events, new books, etc. and fed them into rss2twitter so that they would automatically get fed into his library's Twitter account. This seems like an easy way to get greater mileage out of the RSS feeds that your library is already generating. In messages I exchanged with Jeff, he said the thought he might scale back the feed to just the day's events so users aren't overwhelmed with Twitter messages from just his library or maybe create two Twitter accounts: one for just the daily events only and another that is a mega-feed combining the various feeds the library has.
- Nebraska Library Commission
- Michael Sauers describes on the NLC blog how the commission has started twittering (sorry, I can't bring myself to use the more au courant term "tweeting") the latest reference questions received by the reference department. Although Sauers' blog post, which is dated March 23, says that the answers will be made available, I don't see any there yet.
If you're cheap, like me, you pay for each text message received, often in the range of ten or fifteen cents per message (my monthly texting charges come out a very manageable $0, as I don't really bother with texting myself). Some folks have plans that allow them to buy a monthly bucket of messages (say, one hundred per month). Others may be so into texting that they've paid a little extra for a plan that allows an unlimited number of messages.
While our users might be interested in receiving an updated stream of library content (news, events, question/answer pairs from our reference service, new books, etc.), I'm not convinced
many users would be willing to pay for it (which they in fact would be doing if they (a) elected to receive Twitter updates on their cell phones and (b) have a phone plan where you pay a flat fee per text message or have a limited monthly supply of messages). If a library patron is also a Twitter user but elects to receive messages on IM and their personalized Twitter page, that's OK; its the folks who get Twitter on the cell phones that we might annoy. As Twitter notes to its customers, "Twitter can be addicting, so check your plan to make sure you don't get a huge bill."
Let's leave the issue behind of whether or not users would really want to add their local library as a Twitter friend; assume for the moment that they do. Is there a way that we could use Twitter to provide "reference" in some way? Perhaps. Here's an idea that builds on the way that the Case Grande Library users Twitter (use a pre-existing RSS feed to populate your Twitter account with content) and is inspired by the way that the Nebraska Library Commission promises to provide question and answer pairs:
- User submits question to library (via Twitter direct message option or via chat, IM, email, reference desk, SMS reference, etc.)
- Library answers the question and asks permission to add it (stripped of all personally identifiable information) to a publicly searchable knowledgebase available from the library's web site. That knowledgebase spits out a RSS feed of all newly entered question/answer pairs.
- With permission from the user, the question and answer are added to the knowledgebase, which in turn sends out its RSS feed, which itself is sent to rss2twitter to be passed along to the library's Twitter account.
- Library sets up a Twitter account for reference and advertises it on library web site (among other places, obviously)
- Users add the library as a friend in Twitter so they can send reference questions to Twitter, having been forewarned that there is no privacy in submitting their questions this way (the library could tell users that it's like putting a question on an online bulletin board or forum). Users might also use the direct message option in Twitter to submit their questions.
- The library answers the question in Twitter using the direct message option.
There are more privacy issues in this second model that make me uncomfortable with it. Both models seem a bit awkward, too. My intent in publishing this post is toss an idea out there and see what kind of reaction it gets. Comments (please)?