Monday, November 17, 2008

Going public

One of the tantalizing possibilities of digital reference services is that there is a possibility of getting additional mileage from the artifacts of the reference interaction (a transcript in a chat reference service or the email exchange in an email reference service). Some libraries and services have found ways to dump the artifacts (in raw form or edited down for readibility's sake) into knowledgebases that librarians or patrons might be able to search. If those knowledgebases are set up so they can be crawled by search engines, then the hard and usually invisible work of librarians to connect patrons with information can be surfaced in a very public manner (i.e., theoretically, the interactions could show up in search engine results).

L-net, the statewide chat reference service in Oregon, has just started going down this public road by putting chat transcripts online for those patrons who have approved such use when logging in. The form on the L-net login screen has a "Sharing" section where patrons choose between the option to "Share my question and answer" or "Keep my session confidential." Below the radio buttons where patrons choose whether to share or not is this notice:
We're looking for a few examples of questions and answers to share on our website, but we need your permission to do it. See our privacy policy for more details.
The first chat session that a patron opted in for sharing is now online. I can see a lot of value in doing this:
  • People who might want to use the service can see what chat looks like and what kind of help they might get if they elect to use it.
  • People can actually see the work of librarians; while the concept of our library's collections may be somewhat easy for the public to envision, our reference services are probably not that well known among the public ("You can ask for help at the library?")
  • A searchable archive of question and answer pairs can be easily created.

5 Comments:

At 7:58 PM , Anonymous Stephanie Willen Brown said...

it could also be helpful in teaching future librarians who are taking reference in library school. Thanks for the heads up!

 
At 3:09 PM , Blogger Daniel said...

Hi Stephen,

James Jacobs of Stanford and I have set up a Google Custom Search Engine called Library Questions and Answers at http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=012681683249965267634:qtgsi-qxlku that is trying to index all of the "google accessible" archives of library answered reference questions and their answers.

If you or your readers know of a library Q&A reference blog or archive that looks indexable, please let us know by sending an e-mail to dnlcornwall "AT" alaska "DOT" net.

Thanks for highlighting this resource.

 
At 3:23 PM , Blogger Stephen Francoeur said...

Daniel, funny you should mention that. I just emailed him last week to let him know about the QuestionPoint Global Knowledgebase (which probably is not spidered by Google) and the occasional question and answer pairs that can be found in the blog for reference staff where I work.

 
At 8:31 PM , Anonymous caleb said...

Hey I'm glad someone else is interested in this idea besides me!

I finished working out some of the kinks this afternoon and posted the conversation archive link on our website.

I am less interested in question-answer pairs then I am showing that libraries can help people answer their questions in context.

Dave Lankes spoke at our local VR conference last year and he talked about "the library as conversation" - chat reference is literally conversations, so I've been quipping lately that instead of telling patrons what is, we want to tell patrons what is possible.

 
At 9:14 AM , Blogger Stephen Francoeur said...

Caleb, I like the way that you added the time it took to complete the interaction. I think that is a nice and subtle way to manage expectations on the part of potential users as to what the experience may be like. I've also been thinking a lot about what Dave Lankes has been promoting. Ever since his presentation of Scapes at ALA Midwinter in January 2008, I've been mulling over in my head what that service might really look like and how it would work. A few days ago, I was fortunate enough to be invited to a planning meeting for Reference Extract that was held here in New York. I'm happy to note that your efforts and ideas were mentioned in a positive and serious way during the meeting.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home